Jump to content

GW FAQ - Dreadnoughts P11, BA P19


Charlo

Recommended Posts

 

 

Or they just did the shortest/easiest/least controversial codex FAQs first.

 

A man can hope...

And yet the Plasma Siphon is still iffy!

 

Eldar Starcannons are noted to be plasma weapons in the fluff, yet no effect from the Siphon!

 

Does it also affect Titan level weapons?

 

Otherwise I quite like the rulings so far.

Hahahaha, I never even considered how funny the siphon could be. "Nice blastgun there warhound, wouldn't it be a shame if my little gadget meant you can necer fire it?"

Haha, or if you can actually change the outcome of someone else's Seize the Iniative roll? (for those that remember, there was a "good" debate about that a while back).

 

Thing is, if it wasn't asked I doubt it will be there...

Haha, or if you can actually change the outcome of someone else's Seize the Iniative roll? (for those that remember, there was a "good" debate about that a while back).

 

Thing is, if it wasn't asked I doubt it will be there...

 

Oh Emperor I remember that!

 

Let's hope someone did! If not - I'll post it up on the FAQ when it's posted!

Yes, which makes me hopeful and dreadful of the FAQ/Eratta at the same time. Fixed stats for Dreads and Scouts are my one of my most wanted things for the BA FAQ, next to fixed point costs for Vanguard Vets. I'm not holding out hope that we'll suddenly gain access to Land Speeder Storms or Stormtalons/Hawks through a FAQ/Errata, at least.

The only one relic/character ruling also sucks for BA.

 

Aye but it's not the worst - if you're taking Dante it's not so bad as you have either your AP2 beatstick, or double warlord trait rolled into one.

 

Having a backfield support character with the Veritas be the warlord helps keep him safe and reap the benefits, while a front line HQ like a priest can go off stabbing with AP2.

 

The only one relic/character ruling also sucks for BA.

 

Sucks for everyone, and honestly is it really that bad?  The combination I will truly miss is Valor's Edge & Fury of Baal, honestly..

 

The problem is you can no longer have the Veritas Vitae and any other relic unless you take two HQs and you can never have more than two relics in total unless you take more than one detachment.

 

 

The only one relic/character ruling also sucks for BA.

 

Sucks for everyone, and honestly is it really that bad?  The combination I will truly miss is Valor's Edge & Fury of Baal, honestly..

 

The problem is you can no longer have the Veritas Vitae and any other relic unless you take two HQs and you can never have more than two relics in total unless you take more than one detachment.

 

 

Ok so basically you need 2HQ, 4 Troops and 2 Elites minimum to run double relics..  I get it.

 

But this is pretty much the same thing for everyone, it's not a BA specific nerf.  Come to think of it, there are a lot more annoying relics and relic combinations in other armies, I'm overal not too miffed about it..  And as Charlo mentioned, there's always Dante..

  • 3 weeks later...

Threadromancy, but the SM FAQ is out.

 

Some things from it may gleam into how we could be treated. Stand outs are:

 

  • Apothecary's and I guess Champions, can purchase an upgraded weapon and then become an apothecary, retaining thier weapons! We have the guys as standard so uncertain if we can upgrade (RAW we cannot still though).
  • Lots of Machine Spirit confirmation, all good news.
  • Confirmed only ONE relic per model.
  • SW/ DA/ GK/ BA models joining C:SM units CANCELS out chapter tactics....
  • An Auspex can be used in Overwatch!
  • Drop pod doors are NOT ignored for game purposes! I never thought they were, but people insisted. This will be house rules I feel.
  • Helbrect gets D3+1 on the charge due to rage.

12 pages for the RECENT Codex:SM ....this way, i think that i would be faster for GW to redone the Blood Angels codex from A to Z...rather than publishing....12 ? 24 ?....ect pages of FAQ and Errata....^^. (Ok 2 pages at least for the Errata part...)

So no more gaining HnR from a White Scars IC?

 

If it is granted by chapter tactics, then that exactly.

 

Which is quite good to be honest, we shouldn't be cheesing chapters with mixing. Also the Lib con is nowhere near the level it was, only Ultras get to cast more two powers a turn with it and they aren't mounted.

 

 

12 pages for the RECENT Codex:SM ....this way, i think that i would be faster for GW to redone the Blood Angels codex from A to Z...rather than publishing....12 ? 24 ?....ect pages of FAQ and Errata....^^. (Ok 2 pages at least for the Errata part...)

 

I think we'll get Dread attacks, Scout WS/BS aaaaand that's it for Errata. Maybe a classification on the command squad weapons.

 

Threadromancy, but the SM FAQ is out.

 

  • Drop pod doors are NOT ignored for game purposes! I never thought they were, but people insisted. This will be house rules I feel.

 

 

Glad I stopped by this thread ... I was just saying in another thread that I was thinking of gluing drop pod doors shut to make my painting life easier ... but this ruling renders that a rather foolish move since I'd be robbing myself of several inches. Opening doors and painted interior it is!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.