Jump to content

Black Book - The Eastern Expansion Campaigns


simison

Recommended Posts

I thoufht mire about a brawl where Gwal and Hec attack Raktra ( think of the pic) with Gwal struggles to keep up thx to his wounds. And then is hacked aside. Hec vs rak. Ra. Gets the upper hand. Hec on his knees. attack of the knights. They are like flies. Enough for gwal to recover. He attacks. With wild attacks. Hec rejoins. Noth attack. Gwal jumps on raktras back. Struggle to stay on it. Raktra splits hecs ahield with the grinder, shield of hec shatters, gwal hacks his blade into the neck, raktra gets hold of gwal and throws gwal like a little puppet onto the walls of terra (bone breaking sound) hec uses the diversion to cut raktras swordhand off. Raktra cries out in pain, hitting hec with the stomp. Knights use the opening fir a suicide attack. Then the same as you wrote it out.

 

We have tge glory of a really cool battle scene. Hec has his light. Gwal doesn't look as if he is just there ( he isn't just wounded and off, tat makes no sense as then he shouldn't be evne there).

Uhm, he left out most of the insurrection. He did not fight primarch after primarch in the campaign. And: sanguinius fought a great battle against Kabanda and he fought against Horus. Would you say ( oh he had his moment....leave him be)?

 

This was a 2 lrimarch vs Daemon Primarch thing. If you want to cut something out, then the Knights errant.

So if he battles one. He won't take part in another? Just as I said: you brought up the raid scene which is really cool and it could very well work using both primarchs especially as geal can't keep up anymore due to his injuries, but he fights on. An act of will but nontheless hectarion stays in the spitlight without having looling gwal as a pointless figure just beeing there so thst the knights errant can shine. Sorry to bring this up, but that they are used to bring raktra back to normal size lets gwal looking a pointless weakling and even hectarion as weakling who can't do something without the knights errant.

It's not that they're weak, it's that they're fighting Khorne's number 2 or 3 in circumstances that are a perfect catalyst for Khorne's power.

 

As for the Knights - the majority of them are going to die. Messily. Think Magnus vs Greyloc and his Wolf Guard

But even then 2 primarchs should have at least a chance ( just like in the movie scene 2 against one. Or 1.5 against one) 2 primarchs should do the job or it should be showed that they are the active force here. Having the errants distrsct the daemon okay. Maybe hurting him too okay. But outright ahrinking him makes them superior to the primarchs.

Not shrinking him. Weakening him. Thing is, Raktra at this stage isn't a Primarch, he's a Daemon given all the power that goes with Khorne's favour on top of his gifts as a Primarch. And with the bloodshed on Terra, Khorne's influence is incredibly strong and Raktra feeds off that.

 

It's not any special ability of the Knights that decides the matter anyway, but the weapon they bring into the equation.

And it needs the knights errants to beat him. And if your reasoning is right, sanguinius should have had big problems with kabanda on terra, but he overpowered him.(Ka'bandha is a Greater Daemon of the Blood God Khorne, known as a Bloodthirster. Ka'Bandha is recognised as amongst the most powerful and the most feared of the Blood God's servants and he played an important role during the events of the Horus Heresy.)

He is not as powerful as I see Raktra, but 2 primarchs should have a chance, even a slight one without having him weakened through shenanigans, when Sanguinius beat one of Khornes most powerful servants singlehandedly.

Sanguinius' foresight skews things a bit. And honestly, I was never fond of the way that played out.

 

Raktra, Raktra, where are you? Cos the other point is that this is the culmination of Raktra's conflict with the Shepherds, as his downfall comes partly courtesy of a warrior he always held in contempt, and it comes in a humiliating fashion as the fulgurite's effects allow Gwal and Hec to hack him down (as originally done in my draft, way back).

I'm afraid I agree with Mikhal. This still doesn't sit well with me. It feels more as though Hec, Gwal and Raktra are being used as devices to make the KE shine when the focus should be on the primarchs instead.

 

As to Greyloc vs Magnus: Important point is that Magnus is the only primarch on the field so it's only SW vs Magnus. Here we have Hec and Gwal on the field too

I'm trying to find a middle ground here. Raktra can still deal a vast amount of damage after his wounding - it takes Hec and Gwal to put him down. Maybe he kills Khârn, but the damage is done, and the balance shifts in the favour of the two defenders.

 

For the time being, I'm going to wait for Raktra's input and deal with other stuff.

Well of course we have some books to cover before thst, but some manor pointa should be clear. I mean if we lay the foundation in the lrevious books we could skip the siege of terra and the loyalists forces just invade madrigal.

To show that not having major fixpoints could lead to another outcome.

 

Or icarion ordered the bears death. The revengetory of rhedd leads him to confront icarion and slay the avatar.of chaos through his burning hatred for him.

Leave it as a boxed section for now. The main focus of book 2 is still the campaigns in the east

 

And as to the fight between Hec, Gwal and Raktra I think we should get the details sorted now. If we leave ot until a later date, it could have knock on effects, be too late to change etc. It's just simpler and easier if we sort any issues we have over it now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.