simison Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 Starting the poll: Leave the anthology at the front Move it to the middle before the rules Move it to the end Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334013 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334030 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demus Ragnok Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 3 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334245 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomus Sardauk Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334250 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkcommander Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 3 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334252 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowSwordmaster Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334262 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334271 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Perils Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2. Where should Blunt and IHF praetor outlines go? Id be inclined to say either during the fluff section or just before the anthology Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334276 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelborn Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 3 Keep the format as close to FW as possible in order to be accepted as a likeable project and then spice it with the anthologies as the icing of the cake. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334311 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonair Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 3, same reasons as Kelborn Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334319 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2. Where should Blunt and IHF praetor outlines go? Id be inclined to say either during the fluff section or just before the anthology I think they belong in the fluff, between Organisation+War Disposition and exemplary battles. Doctor Perils 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334333 Share on other sites More sharing options...
simison Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 It's been almost 24 hours. Votes as it now stands: The Vanguard - 0 The Center - 5 The Rear Guard - 4 Hm, that's pretty close. Can somebody poke Grifft for his vote since he'll be doing the work? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334530 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grifftofer Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 I abstain. The time it will take is pretty much 30 secs to drag the pages to their new positions, then maybe 10 mins to fix the Contents page to match the new page numbers (per file). Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334593 Share on other sites More sharing options...
simison Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 2. Where should Blunt and IHF praetor outlines go? Id be inclined to say either during the fluff section or just before the anthology I think they belong in the fluff, between Organisation+War Disposition and exemplary battles. Why here? Doesn't that break the flow of the textbook-style? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334642 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Because they're part of the Legion's fluff, just like the Astartes profiles in the FW books. That's where those profiles go with FW too. Doctor Perils 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334669 Share on other sites More sharing options...
simison Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Because they're part of the Legion's fluff, just like the Astartes profiles in the FW books. That's where those profiles go with FW too. But even the profiles are in the same style, unlike the anthologies. Since Grifft abstains and no one else has voted, we'll go ahead with the Center. (Though now we need to define 'Center'.) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334675 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 (edited) This was because IHF didn't want to mimic the FW style of art. Broadly they serve the same role, so I think they should go in that space. Anywhere else and they wouldn't really fit, whereas coming before the exemplary battles, they give the reader something to visualise for the characters calling the shots. Bear in mind that unlike the FW books, we don't have a heap of pics in the history section to convey the vibe - we can do so with the Harbingers, but they're the exception so far. Edited June 20, 2019 by bluntblade Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5334710 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) OK, I think it's time we went over these again. I think this is how it stands: Book 1 - Revelation [all complete] Prelude [to be done?] The Madrigal Purge (Harbingers vs HW) [complete] The Kataii Ambush (IB vs GS and GS) [complete] The Perfidy of Untara (SH vs Drowned) [complete] Book 2 - Scission [all complete] Mars (HW, FK, Abyssii vs Cognis among others) [complete] Book 3 - Expansion Prelude [complete] Introduction: The False Empire [complete] Conquest of the Tayargund Reach (Harbingers vs FK and Shepherds of Eden) [complete] Nox [WIP] Book 4 - Subjugation Prelude [complete] Introduction [to be done] Iphigenia and Macragge [WIP] The Lion's Hunt (CL vs Geno regiments) The Agony of Chalcea (BoU) [WIP] Book 5 - Attrition Prelude [to be done] Introduction: The Pieces Set [WIP] Iyacrax (IB, Halcyon Wardens(?), Predators(?) vs WB and Godslayers(?)) [WIP] Something with Blackshields and Chimarae? [hypothetical] Retaliation Prelude [complete] Introduction [to be done] Foleith (prologue, VE) [Complete] Evacuation of Thelum (VE and WoL vs WoP) [Complete] The Eastern Fringe (DS vs SL and Drowned, followed by Predators) [WIP] Emancipation Prelude [to be done] Introduction [to be done] Siege of Delos (HW vs EW) [Early WIP] Battle of Revan (SH vs WB) [Very early WIP] Fire Keepers vs Berserkers? [Hypothetical] Escalation (Or Decimation, though my vote would be Eradication or Conflagration) Prelude [complete] Introduction: The Torn Veil [to be done] Blood Crusade general (CL vs BoS and EW) [WIP] Cadia (same as above, but with IB and possibly Nightguard in supporting role - this could be misremembered on my part) [Early WIP] Secession Prelude [to be done] Introduction: Turned Cloaks [to be done] First Battle of Xandria [Hypothetical] Hypothetical at this stage and no place set: Recantation Various smaller campaigns, taking in the Shepherds of Eden, Grey Wardens, Morning Stars and Hammers of Malis as well as Blackshields I haven't managed to keep track. How close is this to what we've got now? Bump. Edited June 24, 2019 by bluntblade Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336209 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Perils Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Looks good to me - had you got something in mind for the blackshield/chimerae battle in attrition? (I'm all for having another battle alongside Iyacrax) I think we'd mentioned grave Stalkers rather than godslayers for Iyacrax, but godslayers would fit better thematically (it's a siege, and Iyacrax would be perfect for showing some early nurgle influences on Aleksandr Kharkovic (sp?) ) EDIT: having quickly counted up the factions in presence again for the Day of Revelation + War of Expansion, i'd recommend not including the Halcyon Wardens on Iyacrax, as they have 3 certain battles, the only legion to have that many Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336357 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Yeah, I want to emphasise Aegar Vyrn, the remnant Shepherds of Eden and their merry band. They're on the borders of Tricendia, so it's a good chance to emphasise how the Insurrectionists are working to isolate it. Chymerae-wise, we've plenty of options between Bears, Scions, WoL and Lions. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336377 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Perils Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 They (the Shepherds) seem to be present for the Tayargund Reach already - wouldn't it be better to show the (eg) Morningstars? How about Morningstars and Scions Hospitalier? They both have the excellence in combat thing (and morningstars, while not exactly "blackshields" aren't necessarily far off) perhaps it could be a Scions Hospitalier and Shepherds of Eden vs Morningstars and {?} Battle? Otherwise, a portrayal of the Steel Legion touching on "evil" would be interesting i think, showing Nomus' temptation towards chaos before he rejects it entirely We could also include a third battle in attrition in a similar way to the othrr books? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336396 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 It's a small number at Tayargund, whereas here they'd be the shattered edition. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336405 Share on other sites More sharing options...
simison Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 This was because IHF didn't want to mimic the FW style of art. Broadly they serve the same role, so I think they should go in that space. Anywhere else and they wouldn't really fit, whereas coming before the exemplary battles, they give the reader something to visualise for the characters calling the shots. Bear in mind that unlike the FW books, we don't have a heap of pics in the history section to convey the vibe - we can do so with the Harbingers, but they're the exception so far. Because they're part of the Legion's fluff, just like the Astartes profiles in the FW books. That's where those profiles go with FW too. But even the profiles are in the same style, unlike the anthologies. Since Grifft abstains and no one else has voted, we'll go ahead with the Center. (Though now we need to define 'Center'.) While I understand the attempt to use 'literary pictures', it feels like it's breaking the tone here. The red books are clearly supposed to be in-universe material, while the anthologies are out-universe material. That's also why I don't mind the anthology being placed between the fluff and crunch since the crunch is very obviously not in-universe. Placing the anthology between the War Disposition and the Exemplary Battles, however, does break what is in-universe and what is out-universe. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336425 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 I meant the praetor sketches and profiles going there, not the anthologies! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336441 Share on other sites More sharing options...
simison Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 I meant the praetor sketches and profiles going there, not the anthologies! Well, with that resolved, we will place the anthology between the fluff and crunch. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/325621-ref-book-outlines/page/7/#findComment-5336448 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts