Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I sent the query as to Korvydea's rules to FW customer services , as well as questioning whether the legion Basilisk and Medusa would be getting 40k rules, at the end of last week and am waiting for a response.....will let you know when I hear back.

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm getting a feeling that they are cutting him off. I don't think any other characters were left out except him...

 

It's rather unfortunate but I guess the reason you took him in the past was to spam assault marines. You don't need him any more for that so maybe they figured he was obsolete? 

 

If they do bring him back, what kind of rules would you guys like to see on him?

I don't think it would be super OP for AM to counts as troops. But I bet that's a rabbit hole GW probably doesn't want to go down. The "counts as" rules in 7th could potentially cause a balance issue when you start to think about Terminators and Kzerkers starting to count as troop choices? It would be a blatant circumvention of the detachment system that they have going on now (which I really like) which encourages different unit types in lists.   

 

He could have a rule that gives some form of Hammer of Wrath like ability to assault marines within 6" of him when they declare a charge?

Edited by Mr. Poe

OR, it would be almost heresy to have Korvydae ride a ... BIKE ... then give Scout Bikes some love.  Like being able to charge after Advancing.  It would be a crazy reach but would only be for him and a Scout Bike Squad within 6" or something.

It could have been a measure against half the RG players using the BA codex back in the 5th. For more reliably landing troops assault marines.

And FW wanted to give RG another way to get troops AM and stay within the vanilla SM codex.

 

As for the scout bikes, on FW’s place I’d just invent a new captain (6th Co?) for this purpose instead of bending Korvydae that much.

They don't have to invent a Captain, since we know all their names. Just give one a model.

 

The easiest way to write out Korvydae would be to simply say he was killed in action with the Deathwatch.

@ C&E - are you suggesting FW intentionally did not include Korvydae in the update?  I mean, killing him off is not a bad idea either as the model was instantly at odds with certain expectations about the Raven Guard at the time.  For me it's primarily about his weapon.  After that, his old rules didn't benefit his company at all.  I get how he may have been competition against something else, that seems petty.  His "failure" at Kastorel-Novem was not a fun read to be frank and him getting shuttled to the Deathwatch was a :facepalm: moment.

 

So it's utterly weird that FW would not include him for 8th edition as he would be a really good dude for the Chapter, I think.

Honestly, Kua, before the Kastorel-Novem campaign book came out, what did we know about Korvydae?

 

Prior to that release he was, as you say, just a sequence of letters.

 

The fact that his special rules are now utterly useless with the changes they've made to list building kind of hints that he WAS left out intentionally.

 

Combine that with the fact that he is a 40k character from a First Founding chapter when FW tends to focus more on the more obscure 2nd and later Founding chapters, and it lends credence to FW killing him off.

 

My money is on dead Korvydae.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.