Jump to content

Sanguinius and his flaws or otherwise


bluntblade

Recommended Posts

Sorry.

 

MoM also suggests that Sanguinius lacked the kind of self-belief that suffused Horus, or at least serious discomfort with the way that the common soldiery adored him, which might well have hindered him. I mean, I don't like that Horus falters as easily as he does in False Gods but it's down in canon that he does. It's hard to see a being so wracked by self-doubt not struggling sooner than Horus.

I'm increasingly thinking that Sanguinius and co needed a middle novel, one that really shows them confronting a changing Galaxy head-on and wrestling with the Rage and Thirst.

 

 

Uh please no, i would argue the opposite, they needed a first novel, one that actually shows us the legion pre Rage and Thirst and looks into what makes them them. Like a scars or a dante.  So we can then follow their change in the heresy scouring. 

Would it be a better storyline or character development if Sanguinius lost his primary arm on Signus Prime?

 

Is Sang a lefty? How about the other Primarchs?

 

...Wut?

 

No really, what? Dude, I know you come out with some nonsensical things, but that's just weird.

 

As for getting a "retcon", we know we're getting a Primarch novel at some point, which will hopefully deal with Sanguinius' first few years under the Emperor, rather than being a 40k Fallout novelisation.

i know i'm a bit of a horus rising fanboy, but his small depiction in that remains my favourite. aloof, but there was a quiet and slightly mysterious.

 

a bit unfair since it was the first and brief, but iév found most of the follow ups don't match the expectation that set for me

 

i'm all down for another book, set at the beginning or middle or wherever. bring back some majesty 

I'm an unashamed Horus Rising fanboy too...... Sanguinius does stay a bit in the shadows and seems to be acting as sort of a quiet advisor to Horus for the most part (at least that's my impression). But, if you look at all of the acts in the book where he is present he comes across as very comfortable with Horus and exhibits an easy confidence. In the heated debate between Horus and Abaddon over how to deal with the Interex, Sanguinius quite confidently interjects his own defense of Horus and once again quite confidently. Although we don't get a lot of face time with the Angel, what little we get gives me the impression of a Primarch who understands his position and is quite comfortable in his own skin.

 

My opinion of Sanguinius remains positive. He definitely comes away form the battle of Signus Prime shaken and a bit damaged, but still unbowed. I think I've explained my position on Imperium Secundus and Sanguinius. Still........ we could use another centerpiece for Sanguinius before the siege to solidify his importance and set the stage for his martyrdom. I think it would be a huge mistake on BL's part not to give us this.

Sorry.

 

MoM also suggests that Sanguinius lacked the kind of self-belief that suffused Horus, or at least serious discomfort with the way that the common soldiery adored him, which might well have hindered him. I mean, I don't like that Horus falters as easily as he does in False Gods but it's down in canon that he does. It's hard to see a being so wracked by self-doubt not struggling sooner than Horus.

 

This made me seriously ROFLMAO. Sorry

Why? MoM has Sanguinius troubled by the adulation he receives. Being less beloved by the brotherhood as a whole and seeming aloof in a way that Horus certainly is not, it seems entirely reasonable to deduce that the pressures would have overwhelmed him as swiftly as they did Horus, if not sooner.

Horus was wary of him. Deeply so, just as he was of Russ and Magnus. Specifically in a confrontation between their Legions.

 

MoM shows Sanguinius being troubled by it. Eyes being a window to the soul and all that. Horus was the better choice, which is the key to his tragedy. It's Harvey Dent going insane, Lucifer falling. The best fails.

 

As opposed to "that other guy was always better because he was perfect".

That's just wishing for a retcon. A follow-up would've been rather more feasible.

 

Why? Look at Dante and how it did a book set in the present while giving half its page count to events set in the distant past.  

 

And even if it is wishing, if you limit your wishes to the feasible you have very poor taste in wishes. 

That quote, then:

 

Sanguinius was next, reluctant and wrathful and soulful Sanguinius, the Emperor's eagle-winged son and the living avatar of the Imperium. The cries that met his presentation rang loudest of all, and the tens of millions of men and women gathered below with far too distant to ever see how their near-worship flickered uneasily in the Angel's eyes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.