Jump to content

Sisters speculation topic


Aqui

Recommended Posts

2 things I saw from the video... 1st the penitent engines where there.. now are they going to stay the same as they are now faction keyword wise?

 

2nd the Imagifier was in a squad...now is it thats how they have them painted OR are they going back to being a unit upgrade?

 

Or am I just reading to much into the video :(

I'm pretty sure it was just a picture of the generic sisters of battle squad box they sell on the site. As for Veridyan, she's prolly just a generic Cannoness, though I wouldn't be upset if she had rules.

Disappointed in the bloody rose trait, but also curious to see how it will tie into some of the melee focused options (repentia, penitant if they get order keyword and celestians/melee seraphim). Also, does anyone else see the Bloody Rose trait as a PMS reference? Way to be inclusive GW...

 

Hoping for a buff to handflamers, as right now they're garbage. Whoo 1 CP to shoot them...once, but could be good for large squad of bolt pistol ladies. 20+ bolter shots would take a bite out of hiding infantry/help clear backfield objectives.

 

Had higher hopes based on all the shenanigans and traits the ork codex has, but at least gw seems like they're trying.

Disappointed in the bloody rose trait, but also curious to see how it will tie into some of the melee focused options (repentia, penitant if they get order keyword and celestians/melee seraphim). Also, does anyone else see the Bloody Rose trait as a PMS reference? Way to be inclusive GW...

 

Hoping for a buff to handflamers, as right now they're garbage. Whoo 1 CP to shoot them...once, but could be good for large squad of bolt pistol ladies. 20+ bolter shots would take a bite out of hiding infantry/help clear backfield objectives.

 

Had higher hopes based on all the shenanigans and traits the ork codex has, but at least gw seems like they're trying.

It's a little bit of a reach with the PMS.

 

Also, that trait makes Celestians go from 2 WS 3+ Str 3 attacks to 3 WS 3+ Str 4 attacks and with a priest 4 attacks.

 

It makes an eviscerator Cannoness (57 pts) jump from 4 attacks at Str 6 Ap-4 d3 damage to 5 at Str 8, making her wound everything on at least a 4+, Marines on a 2+, and with a priest hit with 6!! Attacks.

 

It might not be the trait for your playstyles, but it takes our potential for melee, which was always good but always limitee to our exclusively melee units, and opens up a whole new avenue and effectiveness.

 

My Cannoness was already known as a blender, but with that trait she's going to hit so hard above her weight

I wasnt impressed with the conviction when i girst saw it. The more i think about it, the more i see how nice it is. Makes me glad i made my order made from a combining of elements from argent shroud and bloody rose. Looking forward to seeing what argent shroud has and deciding which to go with.

All i know is ive got a spare cannoness waiting to be put together and shes screaming for an eviscerator all the more now.

I was in a six player Apocalypse game today at my FLGS and the guys had no issues with me trying out the Bloody Rose conviction. I must admiot the +1 STR and +1 Attack came in very handy for my canoness with the Blade of Admonition. My other canoness with the eviscerator never got into melee.

 

 

It's funny that Bloody rose can run 9ppm 3+ save ork boyz.

We don't know what CA will do to the points. And considering that you only get that during the first round of combat, Sisters are still generally worse at melee than the Orks (who are S/T4 now compared to the Sisters 3, also Orks hit on 3+s in melee and have exploding dice options).

 

So no, we don't have 9ppm 3+ save boyz, we have 9ppm 3+ save Guardsmen who can hit like Marines during the first round of combat.

 

Could you be more of a wet blanket dude? It was an amusing comparative anecdote, no need to get all huffy about it.

 

Besides that, the whole 'UM, ACSHULLLY!!!' thing wasn't super necessary either.  There was absolutely no point to this comment, especially considering the fact that you didn't do anything but regurgitate statlines.

 

Sorry, I'm still a bit annoyed by how much crying I've seen from Ork players just because their codex isn't Ynarri levels of broken despite being the best codex I've seen from GW in terms of internal balance and playability.

 

Basically this has been my reaction to Ork stuff posted online lately because of it:

mT8BLYH.gif

Anyways, some basic speculation for Sacred Rose: They're the disciplined shooting order so they're likely going to reroll 1s to hit, maybe ignore penalties for moving and fire heavy weapons on infantry or something as well.

We aren't here to talk about the Ork Codex or the way Ork players are reacting right now. Back on topic please.

Obviously GW isnt afraid to let sisters flamers have increased range to an extent. Im curious to see if we're going to get any other strats to help out the humble flamer?

And now the excruciating wait till CA is made even worse with these teasers.

I am getting more impatient about how things are going to be for the Codex. That said, the year has flown by. It's not much longer ^_^

nah, we'll not get a shoot twice strat. We already have that baked in with AoF. We'll get a shoot better strat.

That comes down to how GW handles AoF since they haven't managed to leave the system unchanged with every update so far.

Hoping that Celestine gets something to let her be taken in any sisters Order without breaking the bonuses.

If she is given OoOML order keyword, thats going to be a bit of a blow to us non martyred lady players.

Hence why i hope she can be taken in any order or have a generic living saint option.

 

Just had a thought. Be cool if there was a stratagem to make a character a living saint! 2 or 3 CP cost to boost the character in some way. Maybe like +1 to most stats or a faith bubble like celestine.

Cannoness and Palatyne dataslate entries could still exist and then the living saint strat. Would rather that than haaving palatine dataslate and cannoness strat.

With lieutenants being added for space marines, I would be surprised if we didn't get a palatine option.  The question is if we will see any of those options that don't have models yet in the beta rules, or will GW hold off on those and only put them in the actual codex.

You could be right - but if they plan on including Ministorum in our dex (and the video has a penitent engine, so I expect they will) it’s an easy way to sneak the mode in for a different ministorum hq/elite.

 

ETA: the model is 50pts in BSF, which is quite a bit more than a priest.

You could be right - but if they plan on including Ministorum in our dex (and the video has a penitent engine, so I expect they will) it’s an easy way to sneak the mode in for a different ministorum hq/elite.

 

ETA: the model is 50pts in BSF, which is quite a bit more than a priest.

It's possible he could have special rules in Blackstone. It also would be nice to see Eccliasarchy fledged out, sinve you can /almost/ take a full no sisters eccliasarchy army...

 

With the new Missionary Pious and the new fat priest, I'm cautious about hoping for at least a little expansion, even if things like Arcos don't get updated.

All the Blackstone units are coming with 40k data-slates, so if anything they'll be available for addition to the Ministorum list pre CA beta dex.  With the releases coming a few weeks apart, is it possible they were intending to include ministorum with sororitas all along?  Though with the tease that PenEngines will be in the beta dex, they should at least get a re-vamp.  With the Missionary Zealot from BSF, new preacher/confessor type, a Ministorum detachment might be worth it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.