Jump to content

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, ThaneOfTas said:

Yeah those messes actually made the GW versions look, well... Not quite good, but certainly a lot less bad in comparison. Same with the characters.

 

They'd be awesome in a knock off Godfall project or even in like, a sci fi reimagining of the Diablo games. They really don't look to fit into anything 40k.

 

Lorgars demon form is pretty cool too. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...

Ghamak is crying about copyright strikes, meanwhile in the land of no f***s given

 

C9VqhVy.jpeg

aG561Oa.jpeg

 

The boltpistol and the cap seem to be referencing the 1992 model. Apparently Artel is hopping on that nostalgia train, they've also shown renders of the 3rd ed Incubi.

 

Yarrick_Old.jpg

52 minutes ago, Scribe said:

I cannot imagine for a second they went to lawyers and confirmed it would be OK.

 

Spoiler

image.gif.5ac838fa560aa114df4648e270f9e011.gif

 

Edited by phandaal
direct image for the good subjects of the crown

Your image is busted.

 

In response to the Image.

 

No, not really. If one wishes to play with fire, I'm not going to be surprised when they get burned, and neither should they.

Edited by Scribe
5 hours ago, DemonGSides said:

I know you're just trying to dunk for dunking points sake, but Artel W did remove products that GW asked him to.

They then turn around and re-listed them with slightly altered designs. Take the Cain and Jurgen models, or the Fischig "Chasener" one. Hell the only one that I can remember that they've not brought back is Gabriel Angelos.

Edited by ThaneOfTas
14 hours ago, Silas7 said:

Maybe a UK thing?

 

Must be. Did not realize how much is blocked for our friends on the other side of the pond. Direct pic uploads are the best bet!

 

On topic - Artel W's stuff is really cool and I would happily paint some of it up for my armies, but with his prices it feels like I might as well get GW stuff, unless he is making something that is just not available elsewhere like this non-infringing Confessor with Powerful Claw.

  • 1 month later...

As promised, the retro Incubi. It's a nice take on a very ancient design, but the poses are overly static in my opinion. I'm also not sure what to do with just 2 models, unless you're recreating the old Vect's Dais. More of a curiosity, I would say.

 

5364481468.jpg

5364481480.jpg

5364475737.jpg

 

You can but them with a new Raidmaster, if you want, who can be bought with two versions of a throne.

 

 

 

However, I'm noticing a clear drop in quality of the female slaves sculpts compared to the old raidmaster. I do appreciate the attempt at crystallisation on the Farseer, though, as I've always been fond of this little part of Eldar lore.

 

 

 

 

Edited by W.A.Rorie
Removed for Nudity in Photos
40 minutes ago, Ayatollah_of_Rock_n_Rolla said:

As promised, the retro Incubi. It's a nice take on a very ancient design, but the poses are overly static in my opinion. I'm also not sure what to do with just 2 models, unless you're recreating the old Vect's Dais. More of a curiosity, I would say.

 

5364481468.jpg

5364481480.jpg

5364475737.jpg

 

You can but them with a new Raidmaster, if you want, who can be bought with two versions of a throne.

 

 

 

However, I'm noticing a clear drop in quality of the female slaves sculpts compared to the old raidmaster. I do appreciate the attempt at crystallisation on the Farseer, though, as I've always been fond of this little part of Eldar lore.

 

 

 

 

And this post will be deleted in 3...2...1...

Edited by W.A.Rorie
removed photos containing nudity from quoted text.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.