Jump to content

primarch fights - the good and the bad


b1soul

Recommended Posts

Then why didn't he do that in the aftermath when he was charging at Iron Warriors? He had Curze in contact with him and the Word Bearers converging on him.

 

Aside from anything else, wraith-slipping has been established to not work on machines, so auto-senses would pick him up.

In the end, he was surrounded by two Primarchs and their Legions. On top of that, was his own Legion under attack, as well. It was a tactical retreat in order to continue the fight on another day and to save as much of his sons as possible.

 

There was no reason to continue the fight. He would've finished off Lorgar easily but fighting for your life and that of your sons for hours and dealing with another Primarch takes its toll. Thus, he avoided fighting Curze.

 

Still curious though who would win in a Corax vs. Curze fight. It would heavily depend on which version of Curze participates. The A D B Curze/ Nighthaunter, who was plagued by his visions or the later "I can see/ predict every move you'll make" Curze.

 

Seemed like both of them were able to withdrew and meld with shadows. Don't think that there were much possibilities on the Istvaan 5 wastes. :P

I forget which novel it is but it disproves everything you have said.

 

- edit -

 

https://www.blacklibrary.com/series/the-horus-heresy/deliverance-lost-ebook.html

I am not spending £10 on Gav Thorpe's prose. Please quote me the sections that prove he could a) evade an army which was aware of him and looking at him at the moment he wraith-slipped and b- fool machines with a psychic power which functions by screwing with an opponent's perceptions.
I possess the story Black Orange linked to and it states nothing of such nature. It only states that Corax can erase himself from other individuals perception if they were not aware of him actively in the first place. He cannot simply pull a Solid Snake and make everyone on the battlefield unaware of him, because they were very aware of him in the first place.
I never said he can disappear before your eyes into thin air. I guess when you’re losing argument try to change what the other person said - very immature imo. And another thing blunty don’t ever tell me what to do because I won’t just on principle alone. Try being polite and nicely asking next time .

Hmm, much as I would like to say most non-lethal primarch bouts are a poor narrative choice, they've often been startlingly well-handled. The obviously suit the narrative and offer character development, and the worst are asanine because they're obviously being used for fanservice. Here's a few personal highlights from both ends:

 

The Good:

 

Rogal vs Alpharius

I thought French handled this one excellently. It was just mundane enough to keep the danger real, all while maintaining that usual primarch larger-than-life feel. The ending pushes it over the edge into one of my absolute favorites.

 

Lion vs Curze (All of ADB's)

Somehow these figures clash like, 3 times under ADB's pen, and each time it feels so many leagues beyond what a normal marine can do. The speed at which things occur is represented very well, as is the force of the battles such as when Curze breaks most of the bones in Corswain's body. Brevity used to great effect.

 

 

The Bad:

 

Vulkan vs Curze (Kyme)

How did this happen. Curze killed Vulkan with tableware earlier this very novel, and now an even weaker (naked) Vulkan can lay the smackdown on an armed and armored Curze? At least he'd been regenerating for a while in UE. No thank you.

 

Sangy v Curze

Not bad per se. It certainly gave some incite into their views on each other. Curze is hurt by being terribly overused, and this seems the least necessary as far as the parent book's narrative is concerned. I give Abnett a pass because he made Curze every bit as threatening (and inhuman) as he should be, even if I thought he went to far with his precognition. Here it just seems cheap, and excuse to have the two of them stalemate and make up a "fun" scenario. Again, not bad, but wholly unnecessary.

I never said he can disappear before your eyes into thin air. I guess when you’re losing argument try to change what the other person said - very immature imo. And another thing blunty don’t ever tell me what to do because I won’t just on principle alone. Try being polite and nicely asking next time .

That was phrased as a request. I was asking how exactly the book, in contrast to another Thorpe story about Corvus and what I'd gleaned about the ability from the wikis, demonstrated that I was totally wrong about the extent of the Raven's abilities.

 

Disappearing was implicit in that statement, because there was really no other way for Corvus to get out of that situation other than to fire up the jump pack, which you seemed to be arguing wasn't his only option because of his mastery of stealth.

 

The FW book Massacre goes further, incidentally, and says that it was only by good fortune that Corvus wasn't lost buying his sons' escape. Presumably down to Curze not immediately piling in with his own claws.

For whatever reason Curze relaxed his grip and that was the break Corax was waiting for if I remember correctly.

Spending time calling Lorgar a dick and he was getting far too into it

Also the prose suggest Corax and Curze had been duking it out before this point elsewhere

 

Sangy v Curze

Not bad per se. It certainly gave some incite into their views on each other. Curze is hurt by being terribly overused, and this seems the least necessary as far as the parent book's narrative is concerned. I give Abnett a pass because he made Curze every bit as threatening (and inhuman) as he should be, even if I thought he went to far with his precognition. Here it just seems cheap, and excuse to have the two of them stalemate and make up a "fun" scenario. Again, not bad, but wholly unnecessary.

 

I believe this was written by Guy Haley in Pharos...or Thorpe in Angels of Caliban (I get all the Imperium Secundus arc novels blurred together). Positive it was not Abnett's Unremembered Empire.

 

 

Sangy v Curze

Not bad per se. It certainly gave some incite into their views on each other. Curze is hurt by being terribly overused, and this seems the least necessary as far as the parent book's narrative is concerned. I give Abnett a pass because he made Curze every bit as threatening (and inhuman) as he should be, even if I thought he went to far with his precognition. Here it just seems cheap, and excuse to have the two of them stalemate and make up a "fun" scenario. Again, not bad, but wholly unnecessary.

 

I believe this was written by Guy Haley in Pharos...or Thorpe in Angels of Caliban (I get all the Imperium Secundus arc novels blurred together). Positive it was not Abnett's Unremembered Empire.

 

 

Aye, it was Haley in Pharos. My point is that I didn't mind when Abnett gave him over-the-top precognition, because a ) it gave Curze back his teeth after VL, and b ) the whole book was a fun look at Curze in his element, it helped portray him as a force of nature, a beast of shadows rather than a skinny guy in boney armor. 

 

I did, however, mind it when Haley carried the trend because it cheapens every scene he's involved in. Curze's victories and defeats are now purely at the whims of the writer. Should he stalemate Sangy, their matching only because of their mutual precognition? Sure. Shall he then lose to the Lion, because reasons? Sure. Not a fan at all.

Iirc at the start of deliverance lost, corax reckons he could have killed curze as well as finishing off lorgar, but that would have almost guaranteed his own death. He also thought he had a slim shot at angron in the same scene.

The only time I remember Corax mentioning Angron is in the short Raven's Flight, where he straight up states he doesn't stand a chance against Angron. Adding only Sanguinius and Horus could hope to beat Angron. Lorgar says something similar in Betrayer (or maybe First Heretic). As I recall, both Curze and Corax look back at the confrontation on Istvaan with the notion they would have beat the other if it came down to it. It's up to the reader to decide who they want to believe, or the two are close enough that it really could have gone either way

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.