Jump to content

primarch fights - the good and the bad


b1soul

Recommended Posts

i'd be interested in seeing a primarch win over one he doesn't think he can

I'd like to think that outside the psychotic ones, a Primarchs self awareness would give them an ability to be honest about their odds.

 

I'm not about to trust Fulgrim but Corax? Khan? Rob? If they say there is a tier 1 level of duelists, I'll trust that.

yeah, i'd say they'd all be good at assessing the facts but that humility or fear (like rogal with curse in lightning tower) may cloud that ability. 

 

and even if they are somewhat correct on paper, i'd like to see a situation where they surprise themselves

 

eg. corax is certain he can't defeat angron, but against all odds, he pulls it off. just.

 

yeah, i'd say they'd all be good at assessing the facts but that humility or fear (like rogal with curse in lightning tower) may cloud that ability.

 

and even if they are somewhat correct on paper, i'd like to see a situation where they surprise themselves

 

eg. corax is certain he can't defeat angron, but against all odds, he pulls it off. just.

The rage at that would eclipse....everything ever printed. :p

 

yeah, i'd say they'd all be good at assessing the facts but that humility or fear (like rogal with curse in lightning tower) may cloud that ability.

 

and even if they are somewhat correct on paper, i'd like to see a situation where they surprise themselves

 

eg. corax is certain he can't defeat angron, but against all odds, he pulls it off. just.

The rage at that would eclipse....everything ever printed. :tongue.:

 

 

 

ha...as in fan rage? bring it on

Given that the Primarchs were created explicitly to lead the armies of the great crusade, and just happen to be really good at smashing foes themselves, I’ve always like pondering which primarch is more effective at doing just that - leading their armies.

I suppose when it comes to legions vs legions, there often comes a point where primarchs must counter primarchs (although there are examples where this is not the case, Night of the Wolf, Furries in a position to execute Anger Man, Alpha’s nearly getting the better of Roby-G) but that’s what is so lovely about the HH as a setting, we get to see how primarchs and their legions stack up against each other.

If you're talking field commanders, the FW fluff paints Horus (of course), Mortarion and I think Ferrus too as being among the very best frontline leaders.

 

I liked how the in-universe author of Betrayal just casually dropped the bit about Mortarion quietly being one of the most talented field commanders in the imperium. It was nice partially because he had (and has still) less consistent development than he deserves, but also because of the surprise. I think this is important, that primarchs' characters and 30k in general should still have the capacity to surprise us. It doesn't have to be big stuff like Guilliman setting up a side-empire but there ought to be more to the main players than could be conveyed in an IA article or whatever. Surprise is worthwhile and if pulled off well will be remembered fondly.

 

So the same applies to Lorgar vs. Corax in The First Heretic. As a worked-through fight scene or a larger-than-life clash of ideals, it's not as good as Angron/Lorgar vs Guilliman or Mortarion vs the Khan. It's exciting and short but it seems to have seriously struck folks at the time and still changes a lot of the perceptions of Corax among both veterans and new readers, at least going by forum reactions.

No one expected Corax to be a killing machine. In fairness probably no one would have completely ruled him out against Lorgar but then neither primarch would have featured in these speculative matchups before The First Heretic anyway, they weren't really a big enough deal. The shock, appropriately mirrored in Argel Tal's earlier shock at what a solo primarch could do to a company of astartes, is something to be valued. Stops Corax being pigeonholed as simply 'the stealth primarch'.

 

Obviously the fight was also a crowning moment in the book for Lorgar's feelings about his role in the heresy, his acceptance of his destiny and his respect for his adoptive father as set against his feelings for his sons' lives. It's more than solid on that.

But the surprise value, that's something we can lose when we're waiting on a book as 'the one where the Lion finally finishes the fight with Curze'. Dorn vs Alpharius was exciting because we didn't see it coming. This is aside from the question of death; I don't think every primarch fight needs to have a death to have consequences or that they necessarily lose tension because no one dies. I'm looking forward to the Khan and daemon Mortarion's eventual Terran rematch for what the dialogue will surely be like. But make a primarch fight into a rote expectation, making it simply what we expected, is a terrible thing.

A primarch's brain is 1,000,000 times more valuable than his sword arm...not enough material tries to highlight this, I think

 

Gathering Storm glossed over this, and I think Unremembered Empire touched upon the power of Guilliman's mind

 

If you're talking field commanders, the FW fluff paints Horus (of course), Mortarion and I think Ferrus too as being among the very best frontline leaders.

 

I liked how the in-universe author of Betrayal just casually dropped the bit about Mortarion quietly being one of the most talented field commanders in the imperium. It was nice partially because he had (and has still) less consistent development than he deserves, but also because of the surprise. I think this is important, that primarchs' characters and 30k in general should still have the capacity to surprise us. It doesn't have to be big stuff like Guilliman setting up a side-empire but there ought to be more to the main players than could be conveyed in an IA article or whatever. Surprise is worthwhile and if pulled off well will be remembered fondly.

 

So the same applies to Lorgar vs. Corax in The First Heretic. As a worked-through fight scene or a larger-than-life clash of ideals, it's not as good as Angron/Lorgar vs Guilliman or Mortarion vs the Khan. It's exciting and short but it seems to have seriously struck folks at the time and still changes a lot of the perceptions of Corax among both veterans and new readers, at least going by forum reactions.

No one expected Corax to be a killing machine. In fairness probably no one would have completely ruled him out against Lorgar but then neither primarch would have featured in these speculative matchups before The First Heretic anyway, they weren't really a big enough deal. The shock, appropriately mirrored in Argel Tal's earlier shock at what a solo primarch could do to a company of astartes, is something to be valued. Stops Corax being pigeonholed as simply 'the stealth primarch'.

 

Obviously the fight was also a crowning moment in the book for Lorgar's feelings about his role in the heresy, his acceptance of his destiny and his respect for his adoptive father as set against his feelings for his sons' lives. It's more than solid on that.

But the surprise value, that's something we can lose when we're waiting on a book as 'the one where the Lion finally finishes the fight with Curze'. Dorn vs Alpharius was exciting because we didn't see it coming. This is aside from the question of death; I don't think every primarch fight needs to have a death to have consequences or that they necessarily lose tension because no one dies. I'm looking forward to the Khan and daemon Mortarion's eventual Terran rematch for what the dialogue will surely be like. But make a primarch fight into a rote expectation, making it simply what we expected, is a terrible thing.

 

 

Corax fought Lorgar in 1st Heretic ? If you play 30k then you know Alan Bligh did a fantastic job writing rules for the primarchs that accurately portray their background and let me tell you Corax is no slouch either .

The same scene with Curze? During the Massacre, Corax attacks Lorgar, who doesn't really fight back, as he believes it's his fate to die there, so gets fairly sliced up, including his face. Curze then swoops in to save Lorgar, they have their stand-off, and Corax flies away.

A primarch's brain is 1,000,000 times more valuable than his sword arm...not enough material tries to highlight this, I think

 

Gathering Storm glossed over this, and I think Unremembered Empire touched upon the power of Guilliman's mind

That’s what I was trying to get at earlier. These were absolutely monsters in combat, but they were meant to lead armies, not butcher battalions like Achilles.

What scene was it? I don't remember Corax in First Heretic.

So the "fight" which you've been touting as a definite Corax win if fisticuffs were to occur, you didn't notice? Because it was right there when Corax jabbed his talons into Lorgars chest

@Lord_Caerolian

 

Lorgar definitely fights back hard when Corax attacks him. Lorgar, wielding his mace and alight with his psychic nimbus, cracks open Corax's chest armour and shatters one of Corax's lightning claws. Corax is simply the better warrior (at that time) and ends up impaling Lorgar.

 

Then Curze interferes and saves Lorgar

The same scene with Curze? During the Massacre, Corax attacks Lorgar, who doesn't really fight back, as he believes it's his fate to die there, so gets fairly sliced up, including his face. Curze then swoops in to save Lorgar, they have their stand-off, and Corax flies away.

Lorgar is fighting hard (he reshapes Corvus' face with his forehead while he's skewered on the Raven's talon), he's simply outmatched.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.