Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 4/17/2023 at 7:39 AM, wecanhaveallthree said:

I haven't had the pleasure of reading a Brooks book before, and I enjoy experimenting with style as much as anyone, but I don't think this was really it.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

 

I'm halfway through the book, and as a 15+ years DA fan/player/collector I find Old Man Lion quite endearing.

  Reveal hidden contents

Edited by Kelborn

Finished it and wouldn't give it more than 5/10. It's definitely not as bad as other Brooks's books but it still reads like poorly written fanfiction.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I'm aware I will be in a minority. I simply don't understand how anyone can consider Brooks writing as decent/readable. I only read it because there are already memes popping out, such as "Corax is dead" and I wanted to know what's that about. To finish it on a positive note. This is my last Mike's book. I gave him more chances than I should and I won't be ranting about him here anymore. I'm glad people are enjoying it as this is a big event in the setting.

 

Edited by Kelborn
  On 4/17/2023 at 7:39 AM, wecanhaveallthree said:

I haven't had the pleasure of reading a Brooks book before, and I enjoy experimenting with style as much as anyone, but I don't think this was really it.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

I have only read a few books with the Lion and am only now starting to dive into more, but I disagree.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I really try not to use 'poorly written fanfiction' as a critique, being a creator of poorly written fanfiction myself, but I think that's spot-on. The end of the book had me legitimately wondering if I'd been fooled somehow, that the copy wasn't genuine. 'Subtlety' is probably the best word to describe what's missing from this book. There's a difference between layering on Arthurian fable and winking at myth and the actual grist of the narrative mill. A lot of flash attempting to disguise a serious lack of substance. In all fairness to Brooks, I wonder if he was under some serious editorial constraints. I don't think even Dark Imperium played it quite so safe - at least there we have Matieu and Colquan.

I think Mike likely had a list of things he had to do like get the Lion equipped, change his armour, get him to Dante.

  Reveal hidden contents

Edited by Kelborn

I've added some spoiler tags here and there and remind you about what I've asked earlier.

 

Even the slightest descriptions or even sarcastic comments can have an impact on others reading experiences and expectations.

 

So again, keep that in mind when writing about this novel.

I'd wager that only 5% of this community has the chance to read it themself. 

 

  On 4/17/2023 at 2:17 PM, Scribe said:

Seems like its not that great.

Expand  

I'd argue that comes down to what you go into expecting. If you wanted the 30k Lion who would punch Guilliman in the face you'll be disappointed. If you wanted a Lion who grew from that and is trying to learn from his mistakes, then you'll probably enjoy it more.

You know what meme where the kids are like, 'We want the Lion! We want the Lion!', and the Emperor turns around and is like, 'No, we've got the Lion at home'?

 

That's Son of the Forest

 

It's like... when Guilliman came back, he was still largely the same guy he was during the Great Crusade. The Primarchs are pretty hard to turn from their intended tracks, largely by design. It's 30K sensibility banging into 40K reality, and Guilliman curses it, hates it, then gets on with the business of fixing it because that's who he is as a character. He made mistakes, sure, and he admits at least some of them - e.g. the Codex - but his stubbornness, his resistance to change or compromise even as The Flexible And Compromising Guy, is what made his transition to 40K so successful. Guilliman is not at all comfortable with the future he finds himself in. He's tired. He's under incredible pressure. He's had a lot of the foundations of his belief ripped away. But the soul of the character is still there, it's grappling with this new state of affairs and trying to find a grounding while staying true to itself.
 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

TL;DR Somehow, Lion El'Jonson returned.

  On 4/17/2023 at 4:18 PM, Arkangilos said:

Can you quote how that goes? That’s basically all I care about

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

It's the last page of the book, make sure you want to see it.

  On 4/17/2023 at 3:47 PM, wecanhaveallthree said:

You know what meme where the kids are like, 'We want the Lion! We want the Lion!', and the Emperor turns around and is like, 'No, we've got the Lion at home'?

 

That's Son of the Forest

 

It's like... when Guilliman came back, he was still largely the same guy he was during the Great Crusade. The Primarchs are pretty hard to turn from their intended tracks, largely by design. It's 30K sensibility banging into 40K reality, and Guilliman curses it, hates it, then gets on with the business of fixing it because that's who he is as a character. He made mistakes, sure, and he admits at least some of them - e.g. the Codex - but his stubbornness, his resistance to change or compromise even as The Flexible And Compromising Guy, is what made his transition to 40K so successful. Guilliman is not at all comfortable with the future he finds himself in. He's tired. He's under incredible pressure. He's had a lot of the foundations of his belief ripped away. But the soul of the character is still there, it's grappling with this new state of affairs and trying to find a grounding while staying true to itself.
 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

TL;DR Somehow, Lion El'Jonson returned.

Expand  

I'm going to quote the Lion from First Legion:

  Quote

"That I was ever, and only, thus," he says, tasting the raw, frigid air of another Caliban dawn. "The hunter. The slayer of beasts."

Expand  

I think his nature on the book matches that. His stated goals match that. Heck, I'd argue his choices reflect that. He sees beasts and that is his highest priority. Arguable during the Heresy he had lost a bit of that in the frustration and anger he felt. 

  On 4/17/2023 at 4:18 PM, Arkangilos said:

Can you quote how that goes? That’s basically all I care about

Expand  

It's literally the end of the book and sets up the Lion and Dante working together at the start of the Arks of Omen book:

  Quote
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

Related to the ending and what Dante says:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 4/17/2023 at 5:59 PM, Scribe said:

So, in short its going to be happy bro times in the imperium. What a wasted opportunity.

Expand  

It was never going to happen. I know people keep wanting some civil war that rips the Imperium in half, but GW didn't do that with Primaris, and I don't think they're going to do it with any loyalist Primarch.

Edited by BitsHammer

I can't wait to read all about the Lion's endless reunions -Luther, Cypher, Azrael, Guilliman- but I bet it will be a while before we get that.

I'd avoid speculation on that front, but yes, Brook's Lion doesn't sound like he's going to put up a civil war against Guilliman.

 

Thank god.

  On 4/17/2023 at 7:05 PM, Allart01 said:

I can't wait to read all about the Lion's endless reunions -Luther, Cypher, Azrael, Guilliman- but I bet it will be a while before we get that.

I'd avoid speculation on that front, but yes, Brook's Lion doesn't sound like he's going to put up a civil war against Guilliman.

 

Thank god.

Expand  

40k's Lion. Brooks may have written the book but he took guidance from the studio on where the Lion was going and what he could do with him. How he travelled those points was up to him, but regardless of the path walked he has a set destination.

 

  On 4/17/2023 at 8:50 PM, Scribe said:

It didnt need to be a civil war, to actually be interesting.

 

Instead its 'wow, I was a dick, and grew up'.

Expand  

 

Why wouldn't that be interesting? "I was a dick, and grew up" is one of the fundamental, archetypal stories humanity has had since... we've been telling stories. It endures for a reason.

 

People coming to terms with where they've come from, who they've been, and how they need to change moving forward is a timeless story.

 

Of course, the execution is where the rubber meets the road. I don't have the book yet so I can't say in this particular instance, but there's no reason "the Lion undergoes character growth" should be intrinsically uninteresting.

  On 4/17/2023 at 9:44 PM, Sothalor said:

 

Why wouldn't that be interesting? "I was a dick, and grew up" is one of the fundamental, archetypal stories humanity has had since... we've been telling stories. It endures for a reason.

 

People coming to terms with where they've come from, who they've been, and how they need to change moving forward is a timeless story.

 

Of course, the execution is where the rubber meets the road. I don't have the book yet so I can't say in this particular instance, but there's no reason "the Lion undergoes character growth" should be intrinsically uninteresting.

Expand  

Agreed. I have read the book and I admit I am not as well read on the Lion as others but him recognizing that he was tricked by his brothers and that he had made mistakes, even if it doesn't have pages of misery porn about it, is still valid.

From that excerpt it looks like Brooks missed the chance to deliver a nice shout out to the HH series enduring classics and install himself as a legend of the lore.

 

All it would have taken was a quick, brutal description of him suddenly punching Dante's head into pulp, after the line about rage filling him.

  On 4/17/2023 at 9:44 PM, Sothalor said:

 

Why wouldn't that be interesting? "I was a dick, and grew up" is one of the fundamental, archetypal stories humanity has had since... we've been telling stories. It endures for a reason.

 

People coming to terms with where they've come from, who they've been, and how they need to change moving forward is a timeless story.

 

Of course, the execution is where the rubber meets the road. I don't have the book yet so I can't say in this particular instance, but there's no reason "the Lion undergoes character growth" should be intrinsically uninteresting.

Expand  

 

Its not a 40K story. Timeless trope? Sure. 40K?

I didnt buy this when I saw it was by Brooks and I know folks will howl when I say this but I really wish Gav Thorpe had been given this. He has made the DA. I’ve been reading Cypher and I’m pretty suprised how well French has written them. So if Gav was unacceptable to the masses surely he would have been a better option than the ork comedy guy? The choice of author for what should have been a massive book is really odd. Are BL having trouble encouraging writers to write??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.