Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'Supplement'.
Found 3 results
-
At last a new supplement! Just announced. Many miniatures of FW, specially Dramatis Personae, are now in this book. But the most interesting thing is... https://www.warhammer-community.com/2023/03/17/the-aranthian-succession-vaults-of-temenos-serves-up-saints-sinners-and-savage-skirmishes/
-
Nobody expects the Inquisition after all It doesn't look like much and almost certainly won't be - but it's better than nothing. Here's hoping it adds some much needed options and improvements!
- 38 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- Octarian
- Inquisition
- (and 2 more)
-
Browsing other non C:SM Chapters forums here, and they all seem to be in a similar place with speculating what may be waiting for their own SM chapter with CA2019, possible future Codex 2.0 / Supplements / WD updates etc. Since our own Codex came out 24 months ago, and with the objectively stagnant state our codex rules have been, I think we have a fairly solid grasp of the weaknesses a Grey Knights army comes with now. So, I had a go at compiling those experiences, ideas and opinions expressed from this GK forum into structured rules, in a format inspired by the recent SM Codex 2.0 rules / supplements. Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 For me personally, it is a way to keep a positive attitude with GKs in this hobby. Regardless of what GW will / wont come up with, having these rules derive from our own experiences into a refined and visually more tangible / usable form, is somewhat of a placating consolation imo. So I thought sharing it here with other GK players could help keep their attitude more positive. So, anyone interested in running these rules against the new and improve SM Supplements / Daemon Primarchs? Lol
- 37 replies
-
- 6
-
-
- Codex
- Grey knights
- (and 2 more)
