Servant of Dante Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Jacobus was a 2nd Ed character who vanished up until 5th Ed's mini-dex came out. So looking at the BoLS article the core of Acts of Faith and Shield of Faith has not changed. Which means the formation likely just gives. Bonus to SoF at most. It really comes down to if the individual units have seen changes or not in their points cost and Acts of Faith abilities if it's worth getting this book to play Sisters with. Yeah, I think I'm going to have to wait to buy this until I can get real information about what's actually in the book. There's no reason for me to spend $40 on a book that is just the e-codex minus Celestine, and even if it has a formation in it, I'm not sure I want to buy it just for one or two formations, especially with all the rumors of 8th edition we've had. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589712 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitsHammer Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Until we know for sure that Celestine is permanently gone I am just going to treat her being missing as the same reason that Khârn wasn't in the Khorne Daemonkin book: it's not related to her or how she works in the setting. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589754 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacefrisian Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 "GW has removed characters before" I'm not sure that any faction has lost more characters than Sisters (some probably have ) (In the order their disappearance) Cardinal Armandus Helfire Saint Praxedes of Ophelia VII Helena the Virtuous, Prioress of the Convent Sanctorum Redemptor Kyrinov, Arch-Confessor Saint Celestine, Hieromartyr of the Paliatine Crusade (maybe) Dark Eldar: Asdrubeal Vect Lady Malys Kruellagh the Vile the Decapitator Baron Sathonyx Duke Sliscus Makes 6. GW does alot of purging and cleansing themselves Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589762 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackarmor_redtruth Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I never understood why we never had access to landraiders or valkeries before, nor some of these character purges. Come on, the entire universe is at war, that is their whole theme. There are going to be some characters. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589769 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montford Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I'm not pessimistic. From the screenshots on BoLS this codex will have everything needed to field an army. The proof will be in the details, especially as this is not supposed to be a cut and paste of the last codex. I need to see how everything has fallen out but I am optimistic and have reserved a copy at my FLGS. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589774 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackarmor_redtruth Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 BoLS has a couple of photos of the book including the contents and the sections describing acts of faith and shield of faith. Looks like AoF and SoF are basically the same, al'la not that special or useful in the current meta. Those should have been bumped up. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589787 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Servant of Dante Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 BoLS has a couple of photos of the book including the contents and the sections describing acts of faith and shield of faith. Looks like AoF and SoF are basically the same, al'la not that special or useful in the current meta. Those should have been bumped up. Well, or a points cut across the board. A Celestian is not worth the same number of points as a Tactical Marine. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589833 Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvih Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 WH40k Facebook replied to a question and flat-out stated that this book is meant to replace the digital codex. Make of that what you will Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589857 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitsHammer Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Huh. So Celestine is going away for a little bit then? A shame really but if she comes back in a new codex or with rules-in-box with a new kit later I can accept it. Only reason to feel upset right now is that it's still not paired with plastic Sisters. I wonder if our new model is FW resin or Finecast resin. Because if it's FW I can accept resin Sisters if we don't get plastic as long as the sculpts match up to the level of the new Canonness or exceed it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589868 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Dawnstar Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Obviously GW has finally caught on to all the talk and complaints about the lack of updates for the Sisters' Codex and has decided to compensate by giving us two in short order (hopefully!). Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589880 Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainMarsh Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I have faith that the Jan/Feb rumors are true.If they aren't true, this was an absolute punch to the face of Sisters players. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589904 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitsHammer Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I have faith that the Jan/Feb rumors are true. If they aren't true, this was an absolute punch to the face of Sisters players. Wouldn't be the first time. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589910 Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvih Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I have faith that the Jan/Feb rumors are true. If they aren't true, this was an absolute punch to the face of Sisters players. Models perhaps, codex not so much. It'd be pretty retarded of them to release C:IA like this now as the AS main codex and then a new AS codex a month or two after. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589934 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drider Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 didn't they do something like that for Tau? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589943 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFlutterPie Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Have faith my brothers and sisters. http://i.imgur.com/cvGg8qf.jpg Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589954 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isolia Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Well they could keep CIA valid upon the arrival of our new specific dex. Those who are inquisition fans in the larger sense can build whatever they want a la witch hunters codex, and then there is the much more comprehensive , richer codex for us with many special characters and units, rules, etc..that you don't get through CIA. Which would go down as you can field minimal SoB forces together with other toys in CIA, or you can fully commit to the bestest of the protectors of the faith and plunge into the real deal with the new dex. Commercially, it'd be interesting too, as you'd not only get core SoB players, but also those CIA owners who have acquire a soft spot for the nuns while fielding them in CIA or reading about them :) And you'd have those who would have the both together, to field some specific extra tools and Moar Sistaz :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589962 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorFish Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 This is basically the Witch Hunters codex and that's the way to view it I reckon. When the updated range comes it won't be anything new - that will need to wait until the next codex whenever that may be. I'd wager not too soon, but is that a bad thing as we've just bought this one? Who's to say Celestine can't come back in another way like a campaign book or similar? Or even a return of something like Chapter Approved... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4589978 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isolia Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Yep, or even as a dataslate if she cones out in a box or in a formation box Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590023 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramza Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 It sucks that Celestine has been removed from the SoB army list but like others have said, she will most likely come back later on with a new sculpt. I personally cannot believe that plastic SoB would be released next year considering C:IA and the re-release of SoB models. I like to proven wrong though :P I would like to add that I had no idea SoB were getting a new army list and having their model range re-released. I literally only found out two days ago. I was so damn happy to see the Immolater back!!!!! Not thrilled about the price hike but I thought I would never get a chance to add one into my army. I bought 4 straight away! Give me that Immolater crack!!!! Now I just need FW to bring back the Repressor. :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590195 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mud Duck Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 I just noted something; over on BoLS they have a shot of the table of contents, and judging from the placement of units in the book, Repentia are now a Troop choice?!? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590228 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Servant of Dante Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 I just noted something; over on BoLS they have a shot of the table of contents, and judging from the placement of units in the book, Repentia are now a Troop choice?!? wat? That flies in the face of the fluff, but when has GW cared about that. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590235 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interrogator-Chaplain Ezra Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 To me it looks like they're Elite, the placement is just odd (hence the confusion). It's the usual HQ, Troops, Elite, Fast Attack, Heavy Support line-up. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590295 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacefrisian Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 I never understood why we never had access to landraiders or valkeries before, nor some of these character purges. Come on, the entire universe is at war, that is their whole theme. There are going to be some characters. We actually had acces to them before (both) Landraider through codex Witchhunters and the Valkerie through Imperial armour vol 2 Forces of the Adeptus astartes & Inquisition (thats the original IA vol 2 btw). And Repentia as troops choice? Thats not actually a bad idea, they are after all punishing themselves and that means they also take a lower rank, the troops section does have the lower ranks after all. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590300 Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T. Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 I never understood why we never had access to landraiders or valkeries before, nor some of these character purges. We actually had acces to them before (both) Landraider through codex Witchhunters and the Valkerie through Imperial armour vol 2 Forces of the Adeptus astartes & Inquisition (thats the original IA vol 2 btw). Fluff-wise the landraiders have always had that 'last command of the Emperor on the subject was dedicating them to the astartes' thing going for them. Rules-wise, in codex WH they could only be taken as a dedicated transport for inquisitors with retinues. The valykrie was a dedicated transport for retinues and also Inquisitorial Storm Troopers (essentially scions in valkyries in modern terms). The sisters themselves never had either, though they have on occasion gained access to Arvus Lighters and Aquila Landers. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590338 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banjulhu Posted December 12, 2016 Author Share Posted December 12, 2016 So the basic Nun with Gun squad is entirely unchanged. Same Act of Faith (got to love the ability to maybe get a universal special rule for one phase that other armies tend to bring automatically all game) and still 12 points each. But it's ok if we take our own slightly modded CAD we can drop ObSec and instead have a once per game ability to re-roll 1s on our armour saves for a turn. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/327990-codex-imperial-agents/page/9/#findComment-4590343 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.