WrathOfTheLion Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 1 minute ago, Triszin said: Reminds me of the redemptor dreadnaught leg plates It's definitely a vehicle or dreadnought with those markings. I would guess it's more like the chest plate of the redemptor though, with how flat those panels are. That's also normally where they put the company marking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01RTB01 Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Missile launcher marines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyrox Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Brutalis Dread chest plate I think BLACK BLŒ FLY 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMawr Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Ultramarine blue is also more of a 40k spacemarine referenceHH usually focuses on Sons of Horus or Imperial fists. Sarvis and WARMASTER_ 2 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylerboodie Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 3 minutes ago, TheMawr said: Ultramarine blue is also more of a 40k spacemarine referenceHH usually focuses on Sons of Horus or Imperial fists. oh is that blue? with the III [days to go] I saw it as Emperor's Children purple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Handsome Fred Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 2 hours ago, TrawlingCleaner said: Yeah, they usually post different shots of previews etc on social media first or at the same time as articles going up Here's today's: Looks like purplish. There is a 3 EC confirmed. WrathOfTheLion 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfTheLion Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Fulgrim wrote the codex and G-man pilfered it from him. Change my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMawr Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) to clarify, obviously in a vacuum that image its color is purple However, GW regularily used filters/lighting in their imaging that makes the ultramarines almost exactly that kind of purple.. but our eyes read it as blue because of the context around it, I had seen images were it was stronger but the closest I have is this.. however the more I look at it the more I just see purple.. ; Nonetheless I think its the dreadnought Edited January 24, 2023 by TheMawr last bit Cactus and Brother Borgia 2 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMawr Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Thats the image I had in mind, also some of the pictures of the 8th edition dreadnought boxset Karhedron, Triszin and Fire Golem 3 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterduch Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 2 hours ago, TrawlingCleaner said: Yeah, they usually post different shots of previews etc on social media first or at the same time as articles going up Here's today's: Ultramarine 3rd company? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_r_parker Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 I think a lot of people here are reading too much into things. GW always make images of countdowns in styles indicative of their settings - but they aren’t always of what they’re looking to reveal. Could this be Ultramarines, could it be 3rd Legion? Doesn’t matter until we start seeing the reveals, and I’m not going to be getting my hopes up for a countdown. phandaal 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMawr Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, m_r_parker said: I think a lot of people here are reading too much into things. GW always make images of countdowns in styles indicative of their settings - but they aren’t always of what they’re looking to reveal. Could this be Ultramarines, could it be 3rd Legion? Doesn’t matter until we start seeing the reveals, and I’m not going to be getting my hopes up for a countdown. as far as I remember the countdowns have always had associations with the reveals.. do you have an example from when it wasnt ? edit: though people are reading too much into the III.. it just means III days to go edit 2: Maybe our mindset isnt that different, I indeed dont think this is as specific as ultramarines or as just said a 3rd company or 3rd legion. Its just a generic spacemarine image... but that does mean a spacemarine related reveal, this picture would not be used for an eldar reveal or a chaos reveal for example. If thats what you meant too then apologies :) Edited January 24, 2023 by TheMawr Fire Golem 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fire Golem Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Just now, m_r_parker said: I think a lot of people here are reading too much into things. GW always make images of countdowns in styles indicative of their settings - but they aren’t always of what they’re looking to reveal. Could this be Ultramarines, could it be 3rd Legion? Doesn’t matter until we start seeing the reveals, and I’m not going to be getting my hopes up for a countdown. I’m pretty certain they are at least almost always related to the reveals, if not always related to the reveals. Emperor Ming 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfTheLion Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 It's obviously not IIIrd legion, definitely Ultramarines, as that's 40k Codex Astartes vehicle iconography from the SM transfer sheet. I know I at least am just being dumb because it's fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramell Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Misterduch said: Ultramarine 3rd company? 2nd company, 3rd vehicle. GW have been inconsistent with these markings, sometimes the number is for vehicle or squad (for transports), sometimes for the company, but the colour always shows company. It would be a red circle if it was the 3rd company. Edited January 24, 2023 by Ramell lansalt 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prot Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Hmmm, the E.C. Horus Heresy markings are more gold in appearance. Plus the purple looks darker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Reinhard Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Clearly ultramarine vehicle marking. 40k era BLACK BLŒ FLY and Warden-Paints 1 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Nord in Gravis Armour Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Ramell said: 2nd company, 3rd vehicle. GW have been inconsistent with these markings, sometimes the number is for vehicle or squad (for transports), sometimes for the company, but the colour always shows company. It would be a red circle if it was the 3rd company. That's the way it SHOULD be, but the current vehicle transfer sheet specifically labels those as "COMPANY NUMBERS." Not "Company colors" or "Squad numbers" or some variation thereof. Edited January 24, 2023 by Lord Nord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nephaston Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Chances are they took a close shot of the 2nd company marking and either decided to edit this to a three because whatever they have for tomorrow countdown picture looks better or is harder to edit. Or they are just trying to misdirect despite it being otherwise super obvious, all for the sake of the tease. "Oooh whatever could this be, it's an enigma, a conundrum, a riddle, a mystery, etc." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramell Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 10 minutes ago, Lord Nord said: That's the way it SHOULD be, but the current vehicle transfer sheet specifically labels those as "COMPANY NUMBERS." Not "Company colors" or "Squad numbers" or some variation thereof. That's because those are all 2nd Company vehicle company markings. That is consistent with the standard markings detailed in the various books I have that go into it, from Insignium Astartes to the 9th ed. C:SM. The exceptions to that rule include the vehicles in the old 2nd Company studio army that's pictured in, among others, the 4th and 5th ed. C:SMs. There the vehicles have different numbers, mostly* for the squads, but always in a yellow circle. The point is that when there's a disconnect between the number and the colour, the colour always matches the company colour. Yellow is always the 2nd, regardless of the number. *the exception is a Predator numbered VI, obviously not a squad transport. Mmmmm Napalm 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Nord in Gravis Armour Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 1 hour ago, Ramell said: That's because those are all 2nd Company vehicle company markings. That is consistent with the standard markings detailed in the various books I have that go into it, from Insignium Astartes to the 9th ed. C:SM. The exceptions to that rule include the vehicles in the old 2nd Company studio army that's pictured in, among others, the 4th and 5th ed. C:SMs. There the vehicles have different numbers, mostly* for the squads, but always in a yellow circle. The point is that when there's a disconnect between the number and the colour, the colour always matches the company colour. Yellow is always the 2nd, regardless of the number. *the exception is a Predator numbered VI, obviously not a squad transport. I don't disagree that that's how it SHOULD be, as I said in my original quote, but again... the label for these transfers is Company NUMBERS. Not Company Colors. Not Squad Numbers. Not Company Colors / Squad Numbers. Company NUMBERS. You might argue they have it wrong, but you can't argue that Company NUMBERS is consistent with your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo1701 Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 I always refer to this for codex compliant company and vehicle Markings and presume it is correct? Mmmmm Napalm, Ramell and Blindhamster 3 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramell Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 28 minutes ago, Lord Nord said: I don't disagree that that's how it SHOULD be, as I said in my original quote, but again... the label for these transfers is Company NUMBERS. Not Company Colors. Not Squad Numbers. Not Company Colors / Squad Numbers. Company NUMBERS. You might argue they have it wrong, but you can't argue that Company NUMBERS is consistent with your argument. Company numbers on company colors. Yellow II, red III, green IV and so on. That's how GW says it's supposed to be, and that's how it is on the transfer sheet you posted. All yellow, all II. And it is consistent with the transfers jimbo1701 posted as well. Those aren't squad numbers on company colors, and I never claimed they were. But it's not yellow circle with the company numbers. It's never yellow circle with III for the third, or yellow circle with IV for the fourth. Only the most narrow reading of a header on a single transfer sheet says anything that could be construed to mean that. That is not how GW does company markings for Ultramarines vehicles. The thing about squad/vehicle numbers was meant to illustrate that a yellow circle with a number other than II still means 2nd company, as GW has also done that on an official studio army, to reinforce the importance of the colour over the number when they, on rare occasions, do not align. It is an aberration, but this combined with the otherwise consistent yellow/II for vehicles of the second should be enough to say that the marking in the preview image is not meant to be a vehicle from the 3rd company. That would be wholly inconsistent with everything else. Mmmmm Napalm and BLACK BLŒ FLY 1 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceDwalin Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) 9 hours ago, tinpact said: Huh, there's an idea for a WarCom filler article: who's the goodest boy of them all? How many dog miniatures do they have in all? There's the Thunderwolves, the Hellhounds and Karanak, the Enforcer dog, and then from AoS the Stormcast bird dogs, the goblin wolves, the undead wolves, wargs from Middle Earth, and...any more? The nasty hobbitses have dogs too. Edited January 24, 2023 by SpaceDwalin Dark Shepherd, Noserenda, Gamiel and 1 other 2 2 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMawr Posted January 24, 2023 Share Posted January 24, 2023 Also orlocks have cyborg dogs (and aesthically fitting) https://www.games-workshop.com/en-NL/Orlock-Arms-Masters-and-Wreckers-2020 WHU witchhunters have 2 dogs https://www.games-workshop.com/en-NL/warhammer-underworlds-hexbanes-hunters-2022-eng And lets not forget the rogue trader dog https://www.games-workshop.com/en-NL/kill-team-elucidian-starstriders-2022 There was also a chaos warband for WHU with a small blind bulldog thing, but its gone like most WHU stuff Aramis K, BLACK BLŒ FLY, Gamiel and 1 other 3 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now