Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Mandragola said:

That’s interesting. It kind of looks like someone has tried to make a hippogriff before it existed. Nice conversion. 
 

i actually have a very old chimera. I’ve taken a few pictures for a size comparison. The hull is very roughly the same length and width, without the tracks. But then it has no engine!

IMG_9750.thumb.jpeg.665a73c218db5083f0bc557786f5e379.jpeg

 

Thanks for the photos. It might work, but it's hard to tell if the wheels are the appropriate size. The plate that houses the turret ring is turned and it has part of it cut off on the Minotaur conversion. The Minotaur engine compartment is made out of plasticard layered on the blank spot left after removing most of the Chimera's rear end. 

Edited by MoriyaSchism
1 hour ago, Mandragola said:

 

i actually have a very old chimera. I’ve taken a few pictures for a size comparison. The hull is very roughly the same length and width, without the tracks. But then it has no engine!

 

 

 

Chimera chassis has twin engines in it's sides. 

 

 

From Inferno#14

 

cbbf4f25d4756762bfeefb41499b02be43fd3725

 

 

Imperial Armour Vol 1 (2nd ed)

Machine-Astra-Militarum-113.jpg

 

On 4/26/2026 at 10:21 PM, Ayatollah_of_Rock_n_Rolla said:

 

Chimera chassis has twin engines in it's sides. 

 

 

From Inferno#14

 

cbbf4f25d4756762bfeefb41499b02be43fd3725

 

 

Imperial Armour Vol 1 (2nd ed)

Machine-Astra-Militarum-113.jpg

 

Putting engines of those size directly above the road wheels is definitely a choice! Also surprisingly nippy for a vehicle with little or no suspension...

 

Edit: By jove, it's faster than a Warrior IFV! That's quite impressive indeed.

Edited by Evil Eye
Amusing factoid.
On 4/26/2026 at 11:21 PM, Ayatollah_of_Rock_n_Rolla said:

 

Chimera chassis has twin engines in it's sides. 

 

 

From Inferno#14

 

cbbf4f25d4756762bfeefb41499b02be43fd3725

 

 

I haven't seen this one in forever. I totally forgot that the turret was remotely operated. 

On 4/26/2026 at 11:21 PM, Ayatollah_of_Rock_n_Rolla said:

 

Chimera chassis has twin engines in it's sides. 

 

 

From Inferno#14

 

cbbf4f25d4756762bfeefb41499b02be43fd3725

I'm curious. The text says it can carry a squad plus officer for 11 ppl in total. However, if you subtract the chinera crew there are only 7 men pictured. Are the last four supposed to crouch in the gangway? Is this a common method? 

 

 

Edited by Rhavien
Can't count!
19 hours ago, Evil Eye said:

Putting engines of those size directly above the road wheels is definitely a choice! Also surprisingly nippy for a vehicle with little or no suspension...

 

Edit: By jove, it's faster than a Warrior IFV! That's quite impressive indeed.

 

Centaur Carrier with the same WWI suspension is supposed to go 110/70...

 

17 hours ago, MoriyaSchism said:

I haven't seen this one in forever. I totally forgot that the turret was remotely operated. 

 

Curently it's manual. I'm not sure if it's supposed to be remote controled on the Inferno cutout and to be fair, there's no way such a small turret could squeeze inside all the mechanism for remote controll and enough place for a guy. Although, LR turret is supposed to have enough space for a gun breach and 3 men...

 

asdfgh.png

 

 

2 hours ago, Rhavien said:

I'm curious. The text says it can carry a squad plus officer for 11 ppl in total. However, if you subtract the chinera crew there are only 7 men pictured. Are the last four supposed to crouch in the gangway? Is this a common method? 

 

 

 

No, no it isn't. I'm pretty sure that either Chimera is to small for what it's supposed to do in fluff (common issue with non-FW vehicles) or the Inferno cutout is not really to scale and was made by someone with vague idea what an armoured vehicle looks like inside. I mean, there's a ladder on it. Going to the turret. A whole ladder inside a tank.

 

Posted (edited)

Are the half-tracks this expensive because you can shoot with embarked Heavy Weapon Teams? If so, I'd have preferred it only as a transport for regular infantry... :confused:

 

Edit: Man I wish we'd get vehicle facings back. That'd make the turreted scout car a lot better at its role.

Edited by Maritn

I suspect that its priced obsenely highly because of the fearsome damage output you can get with in by comboing using the Armoured Infantry detachment, so its like Scions in that its paying a high price for being slightly above avarage in one detachment

11 minutes ago, SgtSharp said:

I suspect that its priced obsenely highly because of the fearsome damage output you can get with in by comboing using the Armoured Infantry detachment, so its like Scions in that its paying a high price for being slightly above avarage in one detachment

 

Right. And this is why detachment rules are a bad idea. Units get priced for the one OP combo and then are grossly overpriced outside of it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.